Posts Tagged ‘arborist’

2.12.2011: Epic fail: Lost again. Finally.

December 2, 2011

Could I start with outing myself as an angry person both before and after tonight’s epic fail of a council meeting.

I was undisciplined enough to express that anger at two groups tonight: firstly I directed it at the chop-till-you-drop mob at Town Hall.

I was told by their leader that to tell them to go where the sun-don’t-shine is ‘defamation’. Poor darlings. I should buy them a dictionary for Christmas. Good on them, though – their side won. You have to hand it to them for their passion. And they didn’t swear like I did: well done.

The other group I expressed my anger at was those on the elected council who failed the people of Newcastle tonight.

They voted NOT to accept the offer of an independent arborist to carry out a process of independent expert assessment. The offer was made by the Premier of NSW and yet it was rejected by all the councillors sitting on what many would view as the conservative side of the chamber. Two of these councillors are members of the Liberal Party. What an affront to the Premier.

The local Liberal MP addressed the councillors before tonight’s extraordinary meeting. He told them the offer of assistance from the state was real and was truly independent, I hear. One of the councillors said there was still an issue of the Council’s insurance company possible not covering the risk of the trees. I believe he was told that wasn’t the case but he still brought it up in Council and alleges he truly believes it’s a problem.

Two Councillors were absent from the EGM on the biggest issue on Newcastle in the last two (or more) years). Cr Connell and Cr Crakanthorpe. What a shame they couldn’t be there.

Cr King quoted the Lord Mayor from over a year ago when the LM was in favour of removing the figs: he had commented on the need for council to make a decision and stick to it.

Cr King pointed out that they had made a decision to remove the trees in July this year and they should stick to that.

I think when that comment was made some people had still held the slim hope that Cr King may have supported independent assessment. Perhaps this was because of the way he voted at the last meeting. That hope faded once he opened his mouth.

The Lord Mayor reminded the chamber that they had voted to keep the trees in December and had expressed regret that they had not stuck to that decision. Crs Osborne, Nelmes and Claydon were all eloquent in their speeches in support of the motion for Premier O’Farrell’s offer – the community thanks them for trying to keep our most beautiful street and reassess the alleged risk.

And who was the councillor who is alleged to have pushed over a little lady in her 70s? NBN has footage so it will be interesting to see if it’s aired.

Sad night. None of us at our best. Thanks council management for bringing us to this point and thanks to councillors for helping them.

Voted against the Premier’s offer:

  • King
  • Jackson
  • Buman
  • Boyd
  • Luke
  • Cook
  • Sharpe

After the vote was lost residents lined the hall to witness the councillors leaving the chamber. We even had a bit of a sit-in at one point.There was quite a delay in the councillors’ departure: as I wasn’t in the chamber I don’t know why but I hear that at least one resident challenged a Councillor for the way he voted and he defended the evidence base he’d used. What reports has he been reading?

Bizarre. The delay in their departure could also have been because of calls of ‘shame’ from us in the hall and expressions of disgust at what these men had just done.

I’m taking suggestions as to what motivated their vote more – dislike of John Tate or solidarity with council officers. Both excellent reasons for removing a million-dollar stand of healthy, beautiful trees that add to the green corridor, provide habitat for vulnerable species and thousands of birds, cool the CBD, contribute to carbon sequestration and feed our souls.

NOT.

Is Brisbane looking good as a place to live or what? Who’s going to take up the challenge of publishing maps of how to get around this town without ever going within view of Laman Street? And bags not watching all those poor animals and birds being killed.

Home.

 

Media release from Independent arborist 31.10.2011

October 31, 2011

White cedar trees in William Street Mayfield

INDEPENDENT ARBORIST ASKS HOW NEWCASTLE COUNCIL CAN REMOVE LAMAN STREET’S FIGS BASED ON OPINION RATHER THAN SCIENCE

Background: Mr Craig Hallam is an arborist who works for over 100 Councils both nationally and internationally. He has inspected the Laman Street trees on several occasions. His company ENSPEC does dynamic testing of mature trees.He spoke with Newcastle City Councillors recently about how to manage the trees and this is his statement after seeing the 7:30 NSW/Stateline report from 28th October. (more…)

We’re in a time warp 26.10.2011

October 26, 2011

Yesterday I had my head down at work when one of the radio stations phoned me and told me of the unavailability of the single arborist chosen to be approached for expert assessment of the Laman St tree risk assertions. (more…)

ARBORIST – “FIGS ARE SAFE.”

October 26, 2011

ARBORIST – “FIGS ARE SAFE.”.

Home

Letter to General Manager from Save Our Figs Inc 23.10.2011

October 23, 2011

Hill's figs aerial roots

Dear Mr Pearce:

We realise that at present you will be engaged in discussions aimed at recruiting the arborist preferred by Save Our Figs from the list of three presented to us by council as part of our recent Agreement.

It is our fervent hope that this will be successful, and that the matter will then proceed in accordance with the process outlined in the agreement.

However, we are concerned that – if that recruitment process is not successful – there appears to be no recourse other than reverting to the previous situation, which was so distressing for so many in the community, and so volatile for all involved. (more…)

Street tree masterplan briefing 11.5.2011

May 11, 2011

A briefing was given to Council about the Draft Street Tree Masterplan last night. Can’t remember a more boring evening at Council, and that’s saying something – I do not know how Councillors do it week in and week out. (more…)

Lillypilly update 16.4.2011

April 16, 2011

This is a picture of the lillypilly I wrote about in March – the one Council and residents wanted to retain but that Council gave up on once the tree was examined by arborist Dennis Marsden. (more…)

My favourite utility area. Not. 19.1.2011

January 19, 2011

Isn’t it fantastic that the youth venue the Loft has decorated council work vans? Isn’t it not fantastic that we can see them in prominent places like opposite the Art Gallery? (more…)

Still vigil-ing and vigilant 10.12.2010

December 10, 2010

Went to the 81st night of the Laman Street vigil tonight and enjoyed the dogs passing by, the usual noisy birds and the occasional debate. To think I thought we should have one symbolic candlelight vigil to mark the (then first) planned date to take the trees out in September. (more…)

Remember when 17.10.2010

October 17, 2010

I was looking last night through photos from the last few months and found shots without plastic orange barriers.

It made me get the voodoo dolls out again and line them up.

 A friend saw in Rose Bay in Sydney a beautiful fig tree surrounded by what was called a ‘tree protection zone’ and sign-posted with the name and number of the Tree Doctor! We certainly have a shortage of those up here. What a fantastic way of looking at veteran trees. And how sad that Mr Hewett, our former arborist, said Newcastle had ‘moved beyond tree preservation’.

Heritage assessment (1.5MB) was done of the avenue of trees [this, like so many of council's documents, is a 'modified' version - there's a PhD somewhere in the nature of modifications through this whole business], commissioned by council and carried out by Heritas Architecture. Page 6 is fun and shows how history just keeps on repeating itself. 

‘In 1957 a short [lucky people] but sharp debate occurred concerning the Laman Street trees. Driven largely by a desire to improve the view from King street to the Cultural Centre, Newcastle City Council proposed removing three trees on the northern side of the street, west of the steps in Civic Park. Strong community opposition was reported to the Newcastle Morning Herald, which commented that

‘Newcastle has an abundance of unobstructed views, but it has fewer trees than any other city in the Commonwealth. The Laman-street avenue may not be majestic [must have been that lopping they loved so much] but it is precious in a city so pathetically bereft of trees”.’

At a vacuum cleaner store in Mayfield (!) an aerial shot of Newcastle that looks as though it were taken about 1960 (not that I can really tell) shows how few trees there were across the city. Apparently loads of customers ask if they can photograph the shot, which is just what I did.

And speaking of photography I love that wedding photo shoots still happen in Laman Street, barriers and all. I was sent photos of two couples yesterday, one of who held between them a sign saying ‘I do’ and the other signing the petition.

I continue to rabbit on about how somehow the arborists who assessed these street trees received the incorrect impression from council that the trees  felled after the 2007 storm were examples of tree failures. In a peer review (89kB) of Mr Marsden’s assessment, done by Integrated Vegetation Management, it is written (italics and emphasis are mine)

In June 2007 , two Hill’s figs located outside the Art Gallery on the southern side of  Laman Street failed due to windthrow. The potentially catastrophic nature of these failures highlighted the need for further intensive investigations into the hazard potential of the remaining trees (personal communication with … Newcastle City Council, December 2009).’

What do they teach arborists?

At the bottom of the post are before-and-after shots of the frightening King Street trees which were removed to ‘do up’ the block. A very nice councillor I was speaking to actually believed that they were hazardous, which is apparently what they were told. Something about ‘some of the people all of the time’ comes to mind. I guess the development of cynicism in the community is not something that bothers many council officers.

The case goes back to court tomorrow. Fingers and toes crossed for the Parks and Playgrounds Movement who are the plaintiff on behalf of tree- and Newcastle-lovers everywhere. If NCC win here it will be a sad day for mature urban trees all over the country and a  sad day for transparency in local government. Parks and Playgrounds rely on donations and membership: you can donate here.

Home 


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 78 other followers